Why This Matters

Transit systems often disproportionately serve some populations while under-serving others, perpetuating social inequities. Traditional optimization focuses purely on efficiency without considering fairness implications. This work is innovative because it provides a rigorous framework for explicitly incorporating fairness into transit design decisions, enabling transit agencies to balance efficiency with equity. The inclusion of priority profiles allows different user groups to be weighted differently in the optimization.

What We Did

This paper develops a mathematical programming framework for designing equitable transportation networks that explicitly consider fairness in access and service quality across different populations. The work formulates the transit design problem with multiple fairness objectives including utilitarian welfare and egalitarian service guarantees. The approach enables policymakers to make explicit trade-offs between different fairness metrics and provides solutions that can accommodate diverse populations with varying transit needs and constraints.

Key Results

The mixed-integer linear programming formulations successfully compute transit networks that achieve different fairness objectives, with Pareto-optimal trade-offs between utilitarian and egalitarian goals. Experimental results on the Chattanooga transit network demonstrate how the framework can be used to design routes that serve diverse populations more equitably while maintaining operational efficiency. The work provides transit agencies with tools to evaluate and improve equity in their service.

Full Abstract

Cite This Paper

@misc{pavia2023designing,
  author = {Pavia, Sophie and Mori, J. Carlos Martinez and Sharma, Aryaman and Pugliese, Philip and Dubey, Abhishek and Samaranayake, Samitha and Mukhopadhyay, Ayan},
  title = {Designing Equitable Transit Networks},
  year = {2023},
  abstract = {public transit is an essential infrastructure enabling access to employment, healthcare, education, and recreational facilities. While accessibility to transit is important in general, some sections of the population depend critically on transit. However, existing public transit is often not designed equitably, and often, equity is only considered as an additional objective post hoc, which hampers systemic changes. We present a formulation for transit network design that considers different notions of equity and welfare explicitly. We study the interaction between network design and various concepts of equity and present trade-offs and results based on real-world data from a large metropolitan area in the United States of America.},
  category = {poster},
  acceptance = {16},
  contribution = {lead},
  journal = {ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO)},
  preprint = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.12007},
  keywords = {transit equity, transportation planning, fairness, network design, optimization, service accessibility, social justice, equitable systems}
}
Quick Info
Year 2023
Keywords
transit equity transportation planning fairness network design optimization service accessibility social justice equitable systems
Research Areas
transit planning
Search Tags

Designing, Equitable, Transit, Networks, transit equity, transportation planning, fairness, network design, optimization, service accessibility, social justice, equitable systems, transit, planning, 2023, Pavia, Mori, Sharma, Pugliese, Dubey, Samaranayake, Mukhopadhyay